Visor de obras.

101

As the complete (?) list of these locations cannot be found in any one source, it is worthwhile to record them here:

(N. del A.)

102

Sebastián de la Nuez y José Schraibman, Cartas del archivo de Galdós (Madrid: Taurus, 1967), p. 188. (N. del A.)

103

Benito Pérez Galdós y la Revista del Movimiento Intelectual de Europa: Madrid, 1865-67 (Madrid: Ínsula, 1968), p. 46, note 59. Some of these dates later proved to be incorrect. (N. del A.)

104

These interests were effectively ignored when the original graph -intended to serve as a sort of reader's guide to my «Benito Pérez Galdós: Liberalism, Journalism, Iberism (1863-1873)», Diss. Univ. of California, Santa Barbara 1979- was photographed by University Microfilms International in sections and placed at the end of that study in the form of six separate, unnumbered, unreadable pages.

In view of Woodbridge's work (note 94, above) a bibliographical reckoning of sources for the information provided here would be redundant. Apart from the studies mentioned by that indefatigable bibliographer, other sources relied upon for general publishing histories of the periodicals and journals covered here include the following reference works on the history of the Spanish Press:

Eugenio Hartzenbusch, Apuntes para un catálogo de periódicos madrileños desde el año 1661 al 1870 (Madrid: Rivadeneyra, 1894);

Manuel Ossorio y Bernard, Ensayo de un catálogo de periodistas españoles del siglo XIX (Madrid: J. Palacios, 1903);

Augusto Martínez Olmedilla, Periódicos de Madrid. Anecdotario (Madrid: Ed. «Aumaro», 1956);

Pedro Gómez Aparicio, Historia del periodismo español, 3 vols. (Madrid: Editora Nacional, 1967-74);

Henry F. Schulte, The Spanish Press (1470-1966): Print, Power, and Politics (Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1968);

Jean-François Botrel, «Estadística de la prensa madrileña de 1858 a 1909, según el registro de contribución industrial», in Prensa y sociedad en España (1820-1936), ed. Manuel Tuñón de Lara et al. (Madrid: Cuadernos para el Diálogo, 1975), pp. 25-45;

María Cruz Seoane, Oratoria y periodismo en la España del siglo XIX (Valencia: Fundación Juan March/Castalia, 1977). (N. del A.)

105

«'Rompecabezas', Galdós' 'Lost' cuento; a Pre-98 Christmas esperpento», Neophilologus, LIX, 4 (1975), 522-47; p. 539n. (N. del A.)

106

Schulte, p. 206. Schulte's uncited source for this information is Ildefonso Antonio Bermejo, Historia de la interinidad y guerra civil de España desde 1868, I (Madrid: Labajos, 1876), 538. (N. del A.)

107

A skilled yellow journalist, Montpensier exploited every opportunity, occasionally inventing some as the need arose, to make the Portuguese candidacy as unpalatable to Spaniards as possible. According to Pi y Margall, soon after the Revolution Montpensier equipped himself with a Spanish newspaper in Lisbon -called, equivocally, El Incoloro- whose daily task was to keep readers in the Portuguese capital abreast of Spanish contempt for Fernando's every «indiscretion». See Francisco Pi y Margall (obra póstuma) y Francisco Pi y Arsuaga, Historia de España en el siglo XIX, IV (Barcelona: Seguí, 1902), 594-96. (N. del A.)

108

This extraordinary document is one of more than two hundred autograph letters written by Montpensier which Natalio Rivas Santiago claimed to possess (along with the key to their coded names) and from which he quoted extensively in his account of the Coburg candidacy, «Don Fernando de Coburgo, candidato al trono de España», in Rivas' Curiosidades históricas contemporáneas (Barcelona: juventud, 1942), pp. 125-197; pp. 146-47. For a brief and considerably less spectacular summary of the entire candidacy question, see Melchor Fernández Almagro, Historia política de la España contemporánea, I (1868-1885), 2.ª ed. (Madrid: Alianza, 1969), pp. 61-77, and Antonio Ballesteros y Beretta, Historia de España y su influencia en la historia universal, 2.ª ed. (Barcelona: Salvat, 1956), XI, 154-89. (N. del A.)

109

Andrés Borrego, Datos para la historia de la Revolución, de la Interinidad y del advenimiento de la Restauración (Madrid: Sociedad Tipográfica, 1877), pp. 38-39. (N. del A.)

110

On Galdós and Fernández Ferraz, see Berkowitz, Liberal Crusader, pp. 51-52, and José Pérez Vidal, «Pérez Galdós y la noche de San Daniel», Revista Hispánica Moderna, XVII, 1-4 (1952), 94-110. It is to the memoirs of Fernández Ferraz that Pérez Vidal owes most of the documentary evidence which places Galdós at the scene of the San Daniel irruption and describes the involvement of young Don Benito as a spectator of that event; see also Walter T. Pattison, «La Fontana de Oro. Its Eearly History», Anales Galdosianos, XV (1980), 5-9. Another Canarian, the radical tinerfeño aristocrat, Benítez de Lugo, was a central antagonist in that bloody skirmish (Pérez Vidal, p. 102n and passim; cf. idem, Galdós en Canarias (1843-1862) [Madrid: El Museo Canario, 1952], p. 133). Galdós' relationship with José Plácido Sansón, editor of Las Novedades (until January 1869), is discussed by Hoar in BPG y la RMIE, pp. 27-29, notes 30 and 32; cf. Ossorio (p. 419), Hartzenbusch (p. 129), and Natalio Rivas Santiago, Narraciones históricas contemporáneas (Madrid: Editora Nacional, 1949), p. 255. (N. del A.)